California’s request to delay prison plan is rejected — latimes.com

Reporting from Sacramento – A panel of federal judges, accusing California officials of obstruction, on Thursday denied the state’s request to delay an order to produce a plan for reducing its prison population by 40,000 inmates.

Aides to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said they would take their request to the U.S. Supreme Court today.

The judges issued their order on Aug. 4 in two long-running lawsuits by inmates.

California’s request to delay prison plan is rejected — latimes.com

Posted using ShareThis

Calif. lawmakers agree to reduce prison spending

By: JULIET WILLIAMS
Associated Press
09/11/09 7:55 PM PDT

SACRAMENTO, CALIF. — The state Senate on Friday approved nearly $1 billion in cuts to California’s prison system, resolving a key piece of the budget-balancing plan lawmakers struck earlier this summer.

The amount is less than lawmakers and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger had intended to cut but represented a compromise between a more ambitious bill passed previously by the Senate and a watered-down version approved by the Assembly.

The 21-15 vote sends the legislation to the governor. Rachel Cameron, a spokeswoman for Schwarzenegger, said the governor will sign it.

“While we are disappointed the legislation fell short on budgetary savings, the centerpiece of this legislation is the parole reform that protects public safety, avoids early release and saves the state nearly $1 billion,” she said.

The spending cuts will reduce the prison population by about 16,000 inmates through a variety of steps. Among them is a change in parole supervision that will focus on only the most violent offenders, giving parole agents fewer cases but concentrating their efforts on the most dangerous ones. Nonviolent parolees who are considered a lower risk will no longer be subject to having their parole revoked and being sent back to prison.

It also expands the availability of credits for inmates participating in rehabilitation programs and changes some property crimes from felonies to misdemeanors. The version passed by the Senate would have reduced the inmate population by 27,000.

“At least it’s a start in the right direction to get this reform … (and) keep our budget under control,” said Sen. Denise Ducheny, D-San Diego.

The vote was a holdover from the grueling negotiations earlier this summer to revise California’s budget and close a $26 billion deficit. The deal struck in July relied on cutting $1.2 billion from the corrections department but did not say how those cuts would be made.

In August, the Senate passed spending cuts that paralleled a plan promoted by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. It called for reducing the prison population by 27,000 inmates through early releases, lowering some property crimes to misdemeanors and easing parole conditions.

It then failed to get enough support in the Assembly, which instead passed the version that returned to the Senate on Friday. It will lead to the release or diversion from state prison of 16,000 inmates.

Because the amount of the prison cuts was less than lawmakers had agreed to in July, more than $200 million will have to taken from elsewhere in the state budget.

At the time, Schwarzenegger criticized the Assembly, saying its lawmakers lacked the guts to approve a comprehensive plan for reducing prison costs.

Republicans remain opposed to any plan that would allow inmates to get out of prison before they have served their full sentences. Part of the plan passed in the Senate drew particular criticism: It would have granted early release to certain inmates with less than 12 months to serve, who are over age 60 or who are medically incapacitated.

That provision was stripped from the final version, but GOP lawmakers and some Democrats said the bill sent to the governor would still endanger public safety.

Sen. George Runner, R-Antelope Valley, said the legislation changes the rules that allow inmates to get early release credits for completing educational or rehabilitation programs. He said they could now get those credits “simply for showing up” and said it would lead to sentences being reduced by half for about 40 percent of current inmates.

“We are just asking for trouble,” said Sen. Tom Harman, R-Huntington Beach.

Schwarzenegger has said the corrections department would not consider sex offenders or violent convicts for early release.

The final bill also omitted another provision sought by Democrats and agreed to by Schwarzenegger, one that would have created a commission to establish sentencing guidelines. Tough sentencing laws such as Three Strikes have been blamed for the overcrowding in California’s prisons.

Such a commission has been sought for years by Sen. Gloria Romero, D-Los Angeles. She reluctantly voted for the bill but criticized the removal of the sentencing commission.

“What’s not in the bill is a resolution and a solution to this urgent crisis,” she said, referring to overcrowding in California’s 33 adult prisons, which has led to a series of lawsuits on behalf of inmates.

Complicating the debate over whether to release inmates early to save on prison costs is a federal court ruling ordering California to reduce its prison population by 40,000 over the next two years. The courts have found that overcrowding is the main reason for substandard health and mental health care.

The plan proposed by Schwarzenegger — and approved by the Senate — would have reduced the inmate population by 37,000 inmates over two years. While Schwarzenegger has supported the plans to cut the corrections budget, his administration has filed a notice with the U.S. Supreme Court indicating it will appeal the federal courts’ early release order.

Secure Parole Re-Entry – Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger

Secure Parole Re-Entry – Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger

Posted using ShareThis

Meth Possession Nets Convicted Felon 60 Years

A convicted felon on parole was sentenced Wednesday to 60 years in prison for possessing methamphetamine in Bullard.
Rickie Dawson York, a 39 year old, plead guilty to possessing 1.46 grams of meth on Oct. 16. A Smith County jury sentenced the Tyler man after 25 minutes of deliberation in 241st District Judge Jack Skeen Jr.’s court.
The third-degree felony, which carried a punishment range of two to 10 years in prison, was enhanced to a first-degree, with a possible sentence of 25 years to life in prison, because of his two prior felony convictions. York will have to serve 15 years before he is eligible for parole.
Bullard Police Officer Shawn Johnson testified that at about 3 a.m. on Oct. 16, he was traveling in the area of U.S. Highway 69 and Farm-to-Market Road 346 when he spotted a car parked in front of a closed business, which had been burglarized in the past. Johnson said he found York sleeping inside the car, which was running with its lights on.
The man did not have identification, claimed to be waiting on his girlfriend and said he thought he was in the Chapel Hill area. After receiving consent to search, Johnson said he found two bags of meth and a bag of marijuana in the man’s pocket. York asked the officer if there was anything they could do to work something out, but Johnson arrested him.
Jurors were shown a videotape of the incident.

He possessed 1.46 grams of meth and 2.93 grams of marijuana, according to lab reports.
York, also known as Mark Burton, was convicted of delivering marijuana in Dallas County in 1996 and possessing a prohibited weapon in Smith County in 2006, for which he was on parole. Beginning in 1987, he has also has been convicted of theft, possession of a controlled substance, failure to identify/fugitive from justice, criminal mischief and theft by check.
Assistant Smith County District Attorney Zach Davis said York continued to commit offenses whenever he was released from jail or prison and will never change his behavior. The defendant testified he has had a drug problem for 21 years but, Davis said, he has never sought treatment for his addiction.
He asked the jury to sentence York to life in prison to send him a message to stop using and selling drugs and stealing from people.
Defense attorney Steven Comte said the punishment range was 25 years to life only because of York’s criminal history, but that he has been punished and has served his sentences for all of his prior convictions.
“There is nothing about Mr. York’s history that is violent and life should be reserved for the most heinous individuals out there,” he said.
Comte said his client has made some bad decisions and has had problems with addiction, but is a genuinely nice man with a wife and children. He told the jurors to ask themselves what a reasonable sentence would be for possessing little more than 1 gram of meth, adding that he believed it would be a sentence at the low end of the punishment range.

Early releases planned to free up prison space

• Reducing sentences by 10 days opens room for 500
• Reformers welcome move to cut record population
Penal reformers last night welcomed emergency measures to cut the record prison population of 79,094 in England and Wales by extending home leave so that up to 30,000 inmates nearing the end of their sentences are released up to 10 days early.
Ministers are expected to confirm today that they will introduce the change, known as a transitional home leave, which could free up to 500 extra prison places.
The prison population has soared by more than 2,100 in the past year as the courts have become increasingly punitive. There are currently only 700 spare places in the 140 prisons in England and Wales and most of them are in unsuitable low security open prisons.
Although John Reid, the home secretary, has promised to provide 8,000 more prison places they may take years to deliver and prison service managers fear that unless emergency measures are taken they will face a crunch period in about six to eight weeks.
The 10-day extension in the home leave provisions will not apply to serious violent or sex offenders or to foreign national prisoners.
Those who are released early will be subject to recall to prison if they breach the terms of the scheme.
The Youth Justice Board confirmed last week that it had asked those running young offenders’ institutions to identify those juvenile offenders who could be eligible for early release to relieve the pressure on the juvenile estate.
The Prison Service also faced the embarrassing situation on Monday that it could not suspend 14 prison officers facing allegations of corruption at Pentonville prison, London, without reducing the number of prisoners at the jail by more than 100 because it was so close to capacity.
Juliet Lyon of the Prison Reform Trust welcomed the minister’s attempts to reduce the prison population: “It is good to see the government at last considering how to reduce prison numbers to sensible, safe levels, but bad that this comes as a knee-jerk reaction to a crisis of its own making, driven not by crime rates but by tough political posturing and even harsher sentencing.”
The Police Federation, however, was unhappy with the move.
“Prisoners should serve their full sentences and if we need more prisons then let’s build them. Whilst the idea being considered by the Home Office may just be to release 10 days early, that’s 10 days less rehabilitation and 10 days more to re-offend,” said Alan Gordon, the federation’s vice-chairman.
Colin Moses of the Prison Officers’ Association was also critical: “It has been well documented that the prison population has reached an all-time high but that should not mean we simply let convicted prisoners out of prison.
“This policy has been tried and tested before and failed. The phrase ’short-term gain long-term loss’ springs to mind. We currently have about 700 spaces in less secure accommodation. Surely if these prisoners pose no risk to the public they should be transferred to these prisons,” he said

Early Inmate Release May Threaten State Fire Force

With the possible early release of thousands of state inmates looming, some fear that Cal Fire’s numbers could be decimated as prisoners are released from state custody.
“I think it’s something that people aren’t even contemplating, quite frankly,” said Republican Assemblyman Ted Gaines of Roseville. “I’m just very angry and frustrated that we’re not focusing on this.”
More than half of the state’s full-time firefighting force is comprised of low-level-offense inmates, who work for $1 an hour while serving their sentence.
If a plan to release 27,000 inmates from prison is approved by state lawmakers, it is possible many of the people currently used to fight fires will be released into home confinement.
“The fires would be bigger. They wouldn’t be contained as quickly. There may be a potential loss of life,” said Gaines. He plans to protest on the State Assembly floor before a vote is taken on the proposal to release inmates. That vote could come as soon as Monday.
The reduction in prison population would help save California up to $1.2 billion, which would be necessary to balance the state budget.

California Scrambles to Prepare for Inmate Release

By BOBBY WHITE and RYAN KNUTSON
California state and local officials, already reeling from budget cuts and public-safety layoffs, are struggling with a federal order to release about 40,000 inmates to reduce prison overcrowding and bracing for the impact on their communities.
State officials have said they will appeal the decision, but as a contingency are cobbling together proposals to comply with the order. At the same time, cash-strapped local governments in places such as Los Angeles and Fresno are grappling with how to monitor and support thousands of released inmates at a time of scaled-down police forces and underfunded social-services programs.
A gymnasium at San Quentin State Prison in California, shown in May, is used to hold inmates’ beds.
“This is just awful [since] the court’s decision is coming at a time when local public-safety has been slashed drastically,” said state Assemblyman Kurt Hagman, a Republican who is a member of the Assembly’s Public Safety Committee. He dubbed the order “ludicrous.”
The decision Tuesday by a federal judicial panel ordered California to reduce its prison population by more than 40,000 inmates from a total of about 160,000 over the next two years, to relieve overcrowding and improve medical care for inmates. The special three-judge panel gave the state 45 days to develop a plan to carry out the order, which caps the state prison population at 110,000, or 137.5% of capacity. The state’s 33 prisons were designed to hold about 85,000 inmates.
California Attorney General Jerry Brown has said he plans to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. The order comes just two weeks after Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a budget deal that includes a $1.2 billion cut to the state prison system.
It is unclear how officials will execute the court’s decision. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation said it is working on proposals to reduce the prison population, but those plans need to be approved by the legislature. If the state doesn’t comply with the order, it could be held in contempt and fined.
Under the Corrections Department’s working plan, however, inmates won’t be released en masse. “We aren’t opening the floodgates and releasing prisoners,” said Matthew Cate, secretary of the department. “We’re taking careful, well-thought-out steps to reduce California’s inmate population.”
The department suggests deporting illegal-immigrant inmates and allowing some low-level offenders to serve the final year of their sentences under house arrest. In addition, the state would reduce sentences of inmates who complete prison rehabilitation programs. The state may also change sentencing guidelines so offenders charged with crimes such as drug possession would be prosecuted for misdemeanors instead of felonies. If convicted, inmates would be sentenced to county jails rather than state prisons.
Assemblyman Danny Gilmore, a Republican, said he expected “very heated arguments over the plan. No one wants to release prisoners, particularly during these difficult times. It’s going to be a very interesting debate.”
Some local governments say they are unsure how they will support new parolees and an influx to their county jails at a time when their own budgets have been hit by the recession and the state’s financial woes.
Steve Whitmore, a spokesman for the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, said the prison-reduction proposals are a major concern. The department has cut about $32 million from its budget and faces an additional $25 million of cuts ordered by county supervisors. Mr. Whitmore said that has forced Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca to consider closing a county jail that houses about 1,600 inmates.
A study completed by Los Angeles County in September suggested that 20% of the state’s released prisoners would require mental-health treatment and 70% would need alcohol and drug treatment. But with the recession and California’s latest budget cuts, “the impact right now would be even worse than it was assumed in September,” said Don Knabe, chairman of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors.
Inmates from Los Angeles County represent about 30% of California’s prison population.
Meanwhile, Keith Carson, a supervisor in Alameda County, which includes Oakland, said budget cuts have resulted in fewer programs to help offenders re-enter the community. The county recently closed a $178 million budget gap with program cuts and layoffs, including eliminating about 100 positions in its sheriff’s office and 14 public defenders.
“The inmates will be released into an environment that doesn’t have the ability to accommodate them,” Mr. Carson said. “It’s going to be easier for them to revert back to their old habits.”
The court order was sparked by a class-action lawsuit filed on behalf of inmates in 2001 by the Prison Law Office, a San Francisco-based inmate advocacy group, which brought attention to understaffed prison hospitals and inadequately trained caregivers.
Write to Bobby White at bobby.white@wsj.com and Ryan Knutson at ryan.knutson@wsj.com

My prison experience – in 100 words

The British Journal of Psychiatry (2009) 195:

Bernice Knight

Visiting an inner-city prison as a medical student, I was unsure how I would respond to this mass incarceration of life. The anxiety manifesting in my stomach as I passed through the entrance gate, the fear of how inmates would respond to me and of names they might call. Corridors were cold, stark, echoic, with a constant reminder of inmates’ plight to end their lives in the endless safety netting; calls from unknown locations and cells with no relief. I don’t have a mental illness, yet I felt anxious and paranoid. It left me very concerned for those that do.

California Assembly passes a slimmed-down prison measure — latimes.com

California Assembly passes a slimmed-down prison measure — latimes.com

Posted using ShareThis

1200 inmates to be moved.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112138379

Page 16 of 17:« First« 13 14 15 16 17 »
MyPrisonSpace.com on Facebook